ext_299328 ([identity profile] owlsforodin.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] poltr1 2008-09-21 02:11 pm (UTC)

Maybe if the election weren't going to be so dadgum close, the major parties wouldn't try stunts like this. Less than 200,000 votes in a single state is way too close for my liking. I don't consider nail-biter elections to be a sign of strength of the system. I consider them to be signs of polarization in society that if allowed to fester will contribute to the overall breakdown of the system. A more substantial but yet still modest (say 55%-45%) margin of victory is more my style. A reasonably sound endorsement of a set of policies without it being a blank check.


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting