<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2011-12-24:1243957</id>
  <title>Daily Doings at the Line of Death Bar &amp; Grill</title>
  <subtitle>(A Virtual Tavern)</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>poltr1</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://poltr1.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://poltr1.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2018-04-28T03:36:48Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="poltr1" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2011-12-24:1243957:585623</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://poltr1.dreamwidth.org/585623.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://poltr1.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=585623"/>
    <title>C# and .NET.....</title>
    <published>2018-04-28T03:36:48Z</published>
    <updated>2018-04-28T03:36:48Z</updated>
    <category term="programming"/>
    <category term="computer"/>
    <category term="career"/>
    <dw:music>John Jarvis, "Solving A Dream"</dw:music>
    <dw:mood>grumpy</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>1</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">(Originally posted to my Facebook wall.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How difficult are C# and .NET to learn? I see lots of job opportunities that ask for those skill sets. But since I never worked with them, I wouldn't qualify for those jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As I understand it, C# is Microsoft's "answer" to Java. Years ago, Microsoft had a language called Visual J++. Rather than have a "pure" version of Java, they put their usual "innovation" spin on it. A judge told them they couldn't do this, that it was too close to the original Java language. So, add some more syntax changes and viola! A new language. Us techie types know there isn't much difference between the two, but to HR people and hiring managers, they're apples and oranges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.NET is, I think, some type of library of callable routines. Years ago (1999-2000), I worked with Visual C++ and MFC. Even after six months, I was still referencing the MFC manual. That told me, "You still don't know the code." I think .NET is an extension and/evolution of MFC, but I wouldn't know.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I had good reference materials for C# and .NET, along with existing code to look at, I could write decent code with them. But again, I run into the old "no experience, no job" wall.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I never cared much for Microsoft's software engineering practices. Or lack thereof. As far as I know, they still don't have a roadmap to CMMI Level 5 compliance. I suppose they're content with producing "average software for the average user". (Yeah, my bias is showing. I much prefer the open-source bazaar to the proprietary cathedral.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=poltr1&amp;ditemid=585623" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
