poltr1: (Default)
poltr1 ([personal profile] poltr1) wrote2006-02-18 02:11 pm

After all these years, I still hate Media Burn......

Earlier this week, a third-rate news station in town (in my not-so-humble opinion) did a half-assed job in reporting about the local pagan community. I didn't see either of the two-part story, but a lot of my colleagues did. The owner of a local pagan bookshop was interviewed, and her words were apparently (or allgedly) twisted in the editing room. The shop's owner is now pursuing legal action.

If the reporter was truly interested in enlightening his viewers, and not perpetuating the stereotype that witches are evil and worship Satan, then he would have taken the time to do the story right. Several people who wrote to the station, and to the reporter. The reporter's response: "Are Satanists Pagan?"

I should mention that the station is owned by Sinclair Broadcasting, one known for espousing neo-conservative views.

Of course, pagans aren't the only ones who get short shrift in the press. If they were to cover a science-fiction convention, they'd focus on the pointed-ear-wearing, Vulcan saluting "Trekkies". Or for a college fraternity, they'll portray them as drunken frat boys a la "Animal House".

Old stereotypes die hard, and the only way to change them is Educate. Educate. Educate. But if the media's not interested in changing their views, then it seems to be a moot point.

[identity profile] bikergeek.livejournal.com 2006-02-18 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm seeing the SF stereotype that gets printed in newspapers shifting from "pointed-ear-wearing Trekkies" to "furries"--and, if the paper in question can get away with it, specifically to "furverts", the people who have sex while wearing fursuits.

[identity profile] shanaeden.livejournal.com 2006-02-18 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I read about that in someone else's journal who actually saw the report. It makes me even more mad that apparently there was vandalism of cars of some women working at the store after the first night of the report. And then the second night they reported the vandalism as just an aside, even though their story had been responsible, and then continued with the "pagans as evil" bent of the story.

*shakes head* Yeah, they suck.

[identity profile] tigertoy.livejournal.com 2006-02-18 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
The public and the media (at least the management of the media) have both come to accept without really questioning that the purpose of "news" programming is to entertain, titillate, and stir up controversy, not to actually inform. If the media landscape was dominated by small independent outlets in genuine competetion, there would still be bad stories and bad outlets, but these days, when giving competent, dedicated reporters the time to discover and report actual news is considered a waste of money compared to covering who's sleeping with whom in Hollywood, who's winning in big-money sports, and (to the extent they tell us about current events at all) talking about what they're saying on the channel next door, not about the actual events, nobody thinks there's a market for journalism. If an independent outfit actually becomes successful with real journalism, they'll be bought up by a big company who will "restructure to reduce costs" and stop wasting profits on those journalists. Basically, it's inevitable that the only coverage of small fringe groups is going to be of the "look at the freaky people (we must all be frightened)" variety.

This is not much comfort if you or your friends are members of a small fringe group. I personally get it regularly from the reporters who report on people who own exotic cats using some PETA brochure they were mailed as the source of the background facts. It has become so standard for media interviews to be twisted in the editing room so what is broadcast is the opposite of what the interviewee said that most exotic owners will not talk to the media at all; of course, this leaves the media with no sources at all to counter the AR agenda. I'm sure that the pagans are in exactly the same boat: the stereotype, inflamed by a few extremists, is that they're crazy people and a danger to society, and any time one of them actually talks to the media to try to correct the stereotype, their words get turned against them and they're likely to be the target of terrorism.

Activism

[identity profile] urban-terrorist.livejournal.com 2006-02-19 02:14 am (UTC)(link)

In the last ten years I've become an activist, and I've learned a few things.

1) No one likes criticism.

2) Solid criticism that avoids vulgar words and threats works best.

3) Tell the whole story - in your blog entry you don't mention the media outlet, the town, or the store name. Rewrite it and mention them with a time line.

4) Play it like a game of chess.
There are media oversight organizations - write them.
There are other media outlets - write them.
There are politicians - write them.

Blog your letters, and the responses. Google does a good job of indexing this stuff. Use Google to find other instances when the media outlet in question did something out of line and blog them too. Let all of the players know what you are doing. It's amazing, but cockroaches really don't like the light.

Think of the media outlet like a pet dog. If you don't discipline it, it will continue to eat your slippers, mess on the carpet, etc. Be consistent, be polite and above all keep doing it until the behavior in question changes.

You'll be surprised at how effective this sort of thing can be.

Everything Under the Moon

[identity profile] urban-terrorist.livejournal.com 2006-02-19 04:07 am (UTC)(link)

Amazing - I coudn't find anything at first, then I caught on, the store name is Everything Under the Moon, and a google search didn't report the story - try:

http://www.google.com/search?hs=jtz&hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=everything+Under+The+Moon+pagan+wgrt&btnG=Search

and

http://www.google.com/search?hs=tEf&hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=everything+Under+The+Moon+pagan+wkef&btnG=Search

Interesting - so there's no pressure from the blogosphere for them to reform. You should report this to the email list.

[identity profile] kliklikitty.livejournal.com 2006-02-19 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry your local media is still locked into such small mindedness. although here they still portray SciFi'ers as either Luke and Leia's or furfoots, it's still type casting. Happily though we are just as likely to get our local coverage of pagans as something closer to the truth. They may spend a lot of time letting so called experts tell how we are all satanists but they do give a few moments to us on the other side of the fence and let us actually say "no, that's not true." And every Halloween we get an obligitory spot on Wiccan Witchcraft the 'wacky but' harmless religion.

As Wicca is now a recognized religion by the Federal Gov our local media is not going to portay it in a bad light for fear of law suits. Our local Pagan community will not let ourselves be interviewed unless we have recieved written promises to be allowed to tell the whole truth and not have it edited into what are essentially lies.


In case you are wondering you know me at a special Inn as S.S.

[identity profile] sins-forgotten.livejournal.com 2006-02-19 04:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I refused to watch the reports as I knew they would be total crap. I avoid that network anyway as 90% of the stuff they report is all crap.