poltr1: (Default)
[personal profile] poltr1
Saw Entertainment Tonight this evening. Apparently I'm not the only one out there who's shocked and stunned by the ousting of Jennifer on this week's installment of American Idol. WTF?

I thought this was supposed to be a talent contest, not a popularity contest! If it was me voting, I would vote on who was either the best singer, or the one who improved the most during the week. I wouldn't vote for someone in this contents only "Because he's CUUUUTE!" If looks are all they're going for, that's pretty vapid.

I can name many singers (mostly folksingers and songwriters) who have great voices and great songs, but don't have the looks. Joni Mitchell wouldn't have made it far if she started her career here. Ditto that for Mick Jagger and Steven Tyler.


And so this week, there are six candiates remaining. Where do I rank them? Before this week, my top two were Fantasia and Jennifer, my middle two were George and LaToya, and my bottom three were Diana, Jasmine, and John S. (John L -- the pen salesman, as Simon called him -- got the lest votes last week.)

I really thought John was going to get the least votes this week. I know he's a fellow Buffalonian -- he's from East Amherst, which is a suburb -- but he seems to have only one style: 1940's crooner. (I suspect he's been listening to his grandparents' LPs.) He's also young, and I'm guessing he doesn't have a lot of life experiences. I don't hear a lot of emotion or passion in his voice when he sings. But he could make a great career as a wedding singer someday...or sell lots of albums with cover songs. There's still a market for that type of music. Ask Michael Civisca.

LaToya's voice just doesn't do it for me. There's no special spark I hear or see when she performs.

So, unless the producers decide to do a recount, or even a revote, my top two are Fantasia and George, followed by LaToya and Diana, and then Jasmine and John.



Guilty pleasure of the week: Most Extreme Elimination Challenge (MXC), on Spike TV. Take a bizarre Japanese game show where the contestants do all these weird physical activities and try to avoid falling into muddy water, add two American play-by-play commentators, throw out the translations, and you've got a riot of a program. (Trivia: The Japanese game show on which this show is derived is called 'Takeshi's Castle".)

Honorable mention goes to...Mythbusters, on the Discovery Channel. Two Hollywood FX guys with over 30 years' combined experience in the industry, with an apparently unlimited budget and almost no time constraints, to systematically debunk many of the myths and urban legends that have been making the rounds of the Internet for the past several years. One of their catch-phrases which is used often is "Don't try this at home. We're what you call 'experts'." I've seen them recreate and debunk myths like the man who fell from the 24th floor trying to prove shatterproof glass, the 'chicken gun' to fire frozen and thawed birds at airplane windshields (the airframers call this "birdstrike testing" and it's necessary for airwothiness certification), the explosive decompression of an airplane fuselage, and the wodden cannon. When I watch them, it's clear to me that these guys love what they do. They're two mad scientists who are serious about what they do....but not necessarily how they do it! That's the type of work environment I want to be in!
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

poltr1: (Default)
poltr1

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223 242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 11:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios