From MSNBC: Gunman injures as many as 15 people at Northern Illinois University.
How do we keep guns away from people who would use them to harm other people?
I don't think a total ban on firearms would work.
We haven't learned the lessons from Columbine or Virginia Tech.
Discuss.
(Aside to
catalana: Please check in!)
How do we keep guns away from people who would use them to harm other people?
I don't think a total ban on firearms would work.
We haven't learned the lessons from Columbine or Virginia Tech.
Discuss.
(Aside to
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 10:54 pm (UTC)This is the "worse before it gets better" part of these shootings. No, we haven't learned from them. In fact, their regularity now gives them a viability to those who want an emotional outlet for their misguided rage.
I think we have to go through this period of turmoil to get to the other side, though. We will, at some point, come out of it shaken and aware. But until people start to have faith in the government, the economy, the world around them, themselves and each other, things will continue in this vein and worsen.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-15 01:53 am (UTC)I'm just glad that the only firearms that I had access to were black powder, single-shot, muzzle-loaders, that I had no clue how to load and use. These were 2 matchlock muskets, 1 flintlock musket, and 1 wheellock pistol. Some of my wargaming friends are also reenactors. Yeah. What a shooting rampage that would have been. Which brings me to a question: Citizens should be able to protect themselves adequately, but does that mean that semi-automatic pistols with 20-round clips have to be generally available? As a bit of perspective, a WW2-era M1 Garand, the US Army's standard issue rifle of the time, was semi-automatic, but had only an 8-round clip. No, owning a firearm shouldn't be illegal, but do we really need to have crowd-sprayers?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 11:35 pm (UTC)What is a gun for, if not to harm others? Guns are weapons. They were created solely for the purpose of ending life.
I agree that a total ban wouldn't work, either, as criminals don't obey laws. However, we must own up to the fact that a gun is something deadly, and has a deadly purpose. Maybe that would help us create more reasonable legislation.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-15 01:50 am (UTC)Yes. They can be used for target practice, or hunting animals, or worse. But as long as the NRA and the Second Amendment crowd keeps singing their one-note song, things are not likely to change.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-18 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-18 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-18 06:45 am (UTC)